September 27, 1934
Instructions Come As Complete Surprise To Business Men
__
Sensation Caused
__
Collector Adrian Pool Opposes Arrangement Effective Oct. 1
__
W.R. Blair, president of the El Paso Chamber of Commerce, last night said the executive committee of the chamber will meet Friday at 4 p.m. to discuss the 24-hour international bridge order.
On instructions from the U.S. treasury department, the international bridges at El Paso will be kept open on a 24-hour basis, starting Oct. 1.
News to this effect created a sensation at the office of the collector of U.S. customs here, inasmuch as it was understood Adrian Pool, collector, had been vigorously opposing the expected order for the past six weeks.
The order was not expected generally, since negotiations had been pending solely with the collector himself, who guarded the matter carefully, and even issued instructions that the news of the order not be given to the public until a later date.
Kept Secret
The order was received at the collector’s office Tuesday afternoon.
Several federal official, discussing the order yesterday, declared no request for a 24-hour bridge had come from any official on the U.S. side of the boundary.
It is known, however, that for several weeks Mexico City officials have been bringing pressure to bear in Washington to obtain the all-night bridge here.
Coming at this time, when El Paso liquor dealers face an almost complete shut-down, because of the special $1000 excise tax soon to be collected from them by the Internal Revenue department, the bridge order is held to be especially tragic to the best interests of El Paso, since, if the saloons here are forced to close, and an international bridge is open 24 hours, it will mean thousands of dollars that would be spent in El Paso will go to Juarez.
Wanted Early Closing
Several months ago, when an agitation was started for a 24-hour bridge, a counter proposal was made that, instead of keeping the bridge open all night, the U.S. treasury department authorize the closing of the bridge at 6 p.m. and not permit its opening prior to 6 a.m.
This suggestion met vigorous opposition from Mexican circles, it is said. At any rate, no action was ever taken on it.
For the past six weeks, it is understood, Pool has been in correspondence with the treasury department in Washington, opposing in strong language any change in the present hours at the bridge, except shorter hours for traffic.
C. of C. May Act
What action, if any, the El Paso Chamber of Commerce will take in the matter could not be learned last night. It was recalled that, three years ago, when the question of a 24-hour bridge was brought into the foreground and precipitated a heated discussion which raged for several weeks, the chamber of commerce was made to understand, in no uncertain manner, that its interference in the bridge matter was not desired by the treasury officials. It was made plain that the treasury department was handling the matter, and wished to be left alone.
It is understood that one of the strongest arguments urged by Mexican officials in their plea for a 24-hour bridge here was that it would not increase operating costs to the customs department, but fit in nicely with the economy program of this government.
Must Enlarge Forces
Customs officials here, however, stoutly deny the accuracy of this claim. With an all night bridge, the customs department will have to employ at least one additional inspector while the immigration and public health departments likewise will have to increase their forces.
The bridge order does not apply to the bridge at Zaragoza, it was learned last night.
The request for the all night bridge was made through the Juarez Chamber of Commerce.
El Pasoans Are Divided In Opinion As To Effect 24-Hour Bridge Will Have
Sentiment among El Paso’s religious, civic and business leaders with regard to a 24-hour international bridge here, apparently is about evenly divided, some expressing the opinion an all night bridge will not materially injure El Paso’s business interests, others deploring the fact the government has seen fit to issue such an order.
In an effort to sound out public sentiment on the question, The Times called a long list of citizens last night and asked their opinion on the matter. Many declined to comment; others apparently took the position nothing they could say or do would change matters, so “what’s the use?”
Following are expressions of those who could be induced to voice an opinion:
W.R. Blair, president of the El Paso Chamber of Commerce: “I do not think the order was entirely necessary. While I am not acquainted with the customs service, I can’t see that the order will do El Paso any good. Personally, I regret such an order has been issued.”
J.B. Blaugrund, retailers’ division, El Paso Chamber of Commerce: “I can’t see where a 24-hour bridge will help the business interests of El Paso. I much prefer the old order of things. It was far better for general business here. I know of no legitimate business that is transacted between midnight and 6 a.m.
H.B. Fort, principal Austin High School: “I don’t think the 24-hour bridge will materially affect El Paso young people, who are going in ever smaller numbers to Juarez. I believe older people will not want to stay much past midnight anyway.”
Rev. W.R. Smith, pastor of First Presbyterian church: “The whole thing is a matter for government control. If people want to carouse, bridge hours won’t make any difference.”
Rev. H.M. Hilliard, pastor of Orchard Park Methodist church: “We can’t hurt Juarez much.”
M.L. Burleson, postmaster: “I do not think the effect of the all night bridge will be at all bad. We used to want it closed so people wouldn’t go over there and drink. Now they can drink on this side.”
Rt. Rev. A.J. Schuler, bishop of El Paso: “The government is the best judge as to whether or not the bridge should be kept open.”
Rabbi J. M. Roth: “I do not approve of a flagrant opening of the bridge. Gambling is in existence on both sides of the river, but it is open in Juarez, while in El Paso we are less obvious.
Rabbi Martin Zlelonka: “I see no harm in the 24-hour bridge. It is a matter for government action.”
Rev. J.B. Cole, pastor of Grandview Baptist church: “I believe to keep the bridge open is dangerous. It can do no good in any way.”
R.R. Jones, principal El Paso High School: “I believe it is an unimportant question. I think there should be unrestricted coming and going between the two countries.”
Recent Comments