Democrats say rating system is cause of mass confusion
Sen. Howie Morales: 'I like it if it can be accurate. Right now it's not.'
Even New Mexico’s 10 highest-rated public schools have miles to go in their drive for excellence, says the state’s chief of public education.
Wood Gormley Elementary in Santa Fe ranks No. 1 statewide with a score of 92.44 points. Monte Vista Elementary in Las Cruces is second with 89.39 points.
Their scores were an outgrowth of the state’s new A-F system for grading 831 schools. Even the schools making good marks now have a road map on how they can gain another 7 or 10 points and turn out even better students, said Hanna Skandera, secretary-designate of public education.
Many people in powerful positions disagree with Skandera that progress has been made because of school grades.
State Rep. Rick Miera, chairman of the House Education Committee, says the A-F system is confusing to all.
“You look at the formulaic version of it and it’s incomprehensible,” said Miera, D-Albuquerque. “A-F grades for schools were supposed to simplify things, but that has not happened.”
State Sen. Howie Morales, D-Silver City, said he will introduce a bill in January to keep the A-F system but clarify and improve it.
“I like it if it can be accurate. Right now it’s not,” Morales said.
He has gone so far as to tell school boards in his southern New Mexico district not to make drastic changes, such as reassigning a principal, because of a school’s grade.
Morales says the system Skandera celebrates as a breakthrough is full of holes.
For instance, he said, 10 percent of a high school’s grade was tied to how students rated their teacher. But high school students have five or six teachers, yet the grading formula made no allowance for that.
Skandera said only 3 percent of the grade actually was based on student responses. As for the confusion over which teacher was being evaluated, she said students knew well enough that their answer was a composite to include all their teachers.
With the state formula now in place, Morales said, certain schools with gains in student proficiency between January and July actually were downgraded. The changes seemed arbitrary to him.
Skandera said a few such grading slumps had occurred, but with a sound statistical foundation.
Valley High in Albuquerque dropped from a B to C between January and July, even though one set of numbers showed it to be on the upswing in student proficiency. But Skandera said a deeper examination of student performance showed that Valley inherited kids who were doing well in middle school, but then their progress tailed at the high school.
Skandera, appointed by Republican Gov. Susana Martinez, said Democrats in Legislature originally said they did not want a narrow grading system based on standardized tests. Now they have a formula that takes into account a series of factors about school performance, but they still complain, she said.
Skandera’s chief critics have been Morales, Miera and Sen. Linda Lopez, D-Albuquerque. Together they have more than 40 years of legislative experience, but how much did public education improve in their time in office? Skandera asked.
New Mexico residents are not content for their schools to rank 48th or 49th nationally, she said.
In the last 18 months, student performance and the effectiveness of schools have taken center stage, Skandera said. In her view, parents and school patrons are more engaged than before.
But adults battling over process or power threaten to get in the way of what is crucial, she said.
“Too many times we miss the opportunity to champion our kids,” Skandera said of the legislators attacks on the Public Education Department.
Morales has been friendly enough toward Skandera, saying he would vote to confirm her as education secretary even when other Senate Democrats questioned her credentials. After two regular legislative sessions and one special session, Skandera still has not received a confirmation hearing from the Senate Rules Committee.
If Skandera finally gets a hearing in January, her reforms on school grading and teacher evaluations are sure to be issues the committee will explore.
Morales said the grading formula for schools is flawed, dense and even detrimental.
When a school can rise or fall a couple of letter grades in a matter of months, the system is broken,
Morales said. Such volatility shows that the Martinez administration’s promise to use three years of student performance data to establish grades is more myth than truth, he said.
Morales said Skandera’s department even changed the formula between preliminary grades in January and the first binding ones in July, further confusing teachers, principals and everybody else.
Skandera said it was true that the formula was modified, but one would not expect it to be stagnant from a trial run in winter to implementation in summer. She also said there were no surprises, as a public hearing about the revamped grading system was noticed and then held in March to make everyone aware of refinements.
Skandera said school grades had excited the populace and started to build momentum for better schools.
“A grandma came up to me and said, ‘Education is now on our lips.’ We are beginning to see progress,” Skandera said.
New Mexico’s top 10 schools
1. Wood Gormley Elementary, Santa Fe, 92.44 points.
2. Monte Vista Elementary, Las Cruces, 89.39.
3. Southwest Intermediate Learning Center Charter, Albuquerque, 88.49.
4. Alice King Community Charter, Albuquerque Public Schools, 86.91.
5. Anthony Elementary, Gadsden district, 86.52.
6. Sidney Gutierrez Middle Charter, Roswell, 86.38.
7. Albuquerque Institute of Math and Science Charter, 85.43.
8. Tatum Junior High, Tatum Municipal School, 84.74.
9. Edgewood Elementary, Moriarty-Edgewood district, 84.46.
10. Early College Academy, Albuquerque Public Schools, 84.02.
All 10 received A’s in the state’s new grading system for schools.
Source: State Department of Public Education
Recent Comments