500-year flood? I don't buy it
One of the arguments against having to pay the stormwater fee is, "Why hurry? It won't flood like that for another 500 years?"
(Setting aside the poor way the tax has been levied on some. Here's the latest breaking news on that part of it.)
So, I'm curious as to your opinion. I mentioned to another editor today that I thought it was ludicrous to think this was a 500-year flood. I pointed out that the number kept changing. First, it was called a 100-year flood, then a 200-year flood, and so on, until suddenly it seemed agreed upon that this was a 500-year flood.
The gentleman said he had lived in El Paso for more than 50 years, and 2006 was the worst rain he had ever seen, so it was at least a 50-year flood.
Then I mentioned An Inconvenient Truth taught me that global warming likely means we'll be getting many more of these floods than in the past.
He then decided I was crazy.
So am I? I couldn't find much in the Times archive that talked about the possibility that global warming means more flooding for El Paso. I did find this mention in a March, 2007, editorial supporting the stormwater fee:
Tax- and fee-burdened El Pasoans certainly don't want to be stuck with another payment, but this one is worth it. For one thing, the fee would help to take care of storm-related projects that have been relegated to the back seat in the past because of costs.
But with the city facing at least $115 million in storm-related repairs -- a figure likely to go much higher -- and other water and drainage projects that have been languishing, money is needed -- money that wouldn't be diverted from other city projects.
The city is growing. There are indications that weather patterns could be changing. The effects of global warming have yet to be fully understood. This uncertainty coupled with past experience necessitates a storm-water utility so that El Paso can recover from Storm 2006 and be as prepared as possible for the next one, whether it's tomorrow, next year, or ...
A KVIA story also raised the possibility of more frequent flooding caused by global warming.
I think we better get the work done, but I could be wrong.
Appraisals
But what I'm not wrong about is that only a fool would blame the Central Appraisal District for high taxes. But letter writers, talk-show callers and many others still do.
Listen folks, I'll try to explain this as slowly as possible. The CAD does not set your taxes. The school board, city and county governments do. The CAD only decides what your house is worth. You WANT the value of your house to go up.
Only in El Paso do people sit around complaining that the value of their house went up.
If El Paso home values go up too much, then the governments should lower your tax rate. And they HAVE several times recently. In fact, El Paso governments have been so good about this recently, that my tax bill has barely increased despite the fact that my home value has jumped 10 percent every year. (10 percent being the max jump they can tax on.)
Every year my home value goes up, I smile knowing I'll get to sell the house one day. You should, too.
Give the CAD a smile instead of a frown.






Recent Comments